免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Arbitration & ADR
Supreme Court
2020

Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb

[2020] UKSC 38

判决理由

The law applicable to an arbitration agreement is determined by: (1) express choice; (2) implied choice; or (3) the system of law most closely connected. Where the main contract contains a choice of law clause, there is a rebuttable presumption that this governs the arbitration agreement too.

事实

A dispute arose under a construction contract with a Russian governing law clause and a London-seated arbitration clause. The parties disputed whether English or Russian law governed the arbitration agreement.

判决摘要

The Supreme Court held that the law of the arbitration agreement is to be determined by applying common law conflict of laws rules, with a strong presumption in favour of the law of the seat.

关键引述

"Where there is no express choice, the law of the seat will generally apply to the arbitration agreement."

Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt

后续处理

Leading Authority

Definitive authority on the law governing arbitration agreements.