免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Company & Commercial Law
Court of Chancery
1843

Foss v Harbottle

(1843) 2 Hare 461

判决理由

The proper claimant in an action for a wrong done to a company is the company itself, not individual shareholders (the 'proper plaintiff' rule). Where the alleged wrong is a matter that could be ratified by a simple majority of shareholders, the court will not intervene at the suit of a minority shareholder (the 'majority rule' principle).

事实

Two shareholders brought an action against five directors of the Victoria Park Company, alleging that the directors had misapplied company property. They sought relief on behalf of themselves and other shareholders.

判决摘要

Wigram V-C held that the action could not be maintained by individual shareholders. The wrong was done to the company, and the company was the proper plaintiff. Since the acts complained of were capable of ratification by a majority of shareholders, individual shareholders could not sue.

关键引述

"The corporation should sue in its own name and in its corporate character, or in the name of someone whom the law has appointed to be its representative."

Wigram V-C

后续处理

Modified

The rule now has statutory exceptions under the Companies Act 2006, ss.260–264 (derivative claims) and s.994 (unfair prejudice petitions).

Related Content

Related Legislation