判决理由
A sewerage undertaker's failure to prevent flooding is not actionable in nuisance or under the HRA where the statutory scheme (Water Industry Act 1991) provides its own enforcement mechanism through Ofwat.
事实
Mr Marcic's property was repeatedly flooded by sewage from an overloaded sewer. He sued Thames Water in nuisance and under Article 8 ECHR.
判决摘要
The House of Lords held that the statutory scheme under the Water Industry Act 1991 was the exclusive remedy. Claims in nuisance were precluded by the statutory framework.
关键引述
"The existence of the statutory scheme is inconsistent with a duty of care in the common law of nuisance."
— Lord Nicholls
后续处理
Leading Authority
Key authority on the interaction between statutory schemes and common law claims.