判决理由
Common law fairness requires the Parole Board to hold an oral hearing whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one. The Board must not adopt an unduly restrictive approach to directing oral hearings.
事实
Three prisoners challenged Parole Board decisions made on paper without oral hearings. They argued that fairness required an oral hearing before their cases could be properly determined.
判决摘要
The Supreme Court held that the Parole Board must hold oral hearings whenever fairness requires them. Important factual issues that cannot be resolved on the papers, or issues of credibility, will normally require an oral hearing.
关键引述
"The common law duty of procedural fairness does not stand still. It requires the Board to hold oral hearings whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one."
— Lord Reed
后续处理
Led to significant increase in Parole Board oral hearings.