免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Human Rights
House of Lords
2001

R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2001] UKHL 26

判决理由

Proportionality is a more structured and rigorous test than Wednesbury unreasonableness. Where Convention rights are at stake, the court must conduct a proportionality analysis rather than simply asking whether the decision was irrational.

事实

A prison policy required prisoners to be absent from their cells during searches, during which legally privileged correspondence could be examined.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held the blanket policy was unlawful as a disproportionate interference with the right to legal professional privilege. Lord Steyn explained the difference between Wednesbury and proportionality review.

关键引述

"The intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach... the proportionality test may go further than the traditional grounds of review."

Lord Steyn

后续处理

Good law

Key authority on the distinction between Wednesbury and proportionality review.