免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Criminal Law
Queen's Bench Division
1884

R v Dudley and Stephens

(1884) 14 QBD 273

判决理由

Necessity is not a defence to murder. No matter how extreme the circumstances, one person cannot lawfully take the life of another innocent person to preserve their own life.

事实

Dudley and Stephens were shipwrecked sailors adrift on a lifeboat with a cabin boy, Richard Parker, who was ill from drinking seawater. After 20 days without food, they killed and ate the boy. They were rescued four days later.

判决摘要

Lord Coleridge CJ held that necessity could not justify murder. The men were convicted of murder but their death sentences were commuted to six months' imprisonment by the Crown. The case established that necessity is no defence to murder in English law.

关键引述

"It must not be supposed that in refusing to admit temptation to be an excuse for crime it is forgotten how terrible the temptation was... But we are often compelled to set up standards we cannot reach ourselves."

Lord Coleridge CJ

后续处理

Good law

Confirmed in R v Howe [1987] — necessity and duress are no defence to murder.