免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Criminal Law
Supreme Court
2016

R v Golds

[2016] UKSC 61

判决理由

For the partial defence of diminished responsibility under s 52 Coroners and Justice Act 2009, 'substantial' impairment means an impairment that is more than merely trivial — it need not be total but it must be significant or appreciable.

事实

The defendant killed his partner. He raised the partial defence of diminished responsibility, relying on a personality disorder.

判决摘要

The Supreme Court held that 'substantial' means something between trivial and total. In most cases, no direction is needed on the meaning of substantial, but where there is an issue, the judge should direct that it means more than merely trivial.

关键引述

"Substantial does not mean total, but it means more than merely trivial or minimal."

Lord Hughes

后续处理

Good law

The leading authority on the meaning of 'substantial' in the diminished responsibility defence.