免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Criminal Law
House of Lords
2005

R v Hasan

[2005] UKHL 22

判决理由

Duress is not available if the defendant voluntarily associated with criminals in circumstances where he ought reasonably to have foreseen compulsion by threats of violence.

事实

Hasan was a driver for a woman involved in prostitution. Her violent associate allegedly threatened Hasan to commit a burglary. Hasan claimed duress.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held that Hasan could not rely on duress because he had voluntarily associated with a violent criminal. The defence of duress must be kept within strict limits.

关键引述

"The defence of duress is confined within very narrow limits. It is easy to raise and very difficult to disprove."

Lord Bingham

后续处理

Good law

Leading modern authority on the limitations of the duress defence.