免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Criminal Law
Court of Appeal
1971

R v Roberts

(1971) 56 Cr App R 95

判决理由

Where a victim takes evasive action to escape the defendant's unlawful conduct, the defendant is liable for the resulting injuries provided the victim's reaction was within the range of reasonably foreseeable responses.

事实

Roberts made unwanted sexual advances to a woman in his car. She jumped from the moving car and was injured.

判决摘要

The conviction for ABH was upheld. The victim's act of jumping was a reasonably foreseeable reaction. Only a 'daft' or 'wholly unexpected' response would break the chain of causation.

关键引述

"The test is whether the victim's act was the natural result of what the assailant said and did, in the sense that it was something that could reasonably have been foreseen."

Stephenson LJ

后续处理

Good law

Key authority on victim response and causation. Applied in R v Williams and Davis [1992].