判决理由
For an advertisement to be an election expense, it must be specifically directed to affecting the result in a particular constituency rather than a general political advertisement.
事实
A mining company published an advertisement in The Times during a general election, criticising the Labour Party's nationalisation policies. The company was prosecuted for failing to include a proper imprint and for incurring an unauthorised election expense.
判决摘要
McNair J acquitted the company. The advertisement was a general political statement about nationalisation policy, not specifically directed at influencing voters in any particular constituency. It was therefore not an election expense.
关键引述
"For expenditure to be an election expense, it must be incurred with a view to promoting or procuring the election of a candidate in a particular constituency."
— McNair J
后续处理
The law has been substantially reformed by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 and subsequent legislation.