免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Childcare & Safeguarding
House of Lords
1986

Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority

[1986] AC 112

判决理由

A child under 16 has the legal capacity to consent to medical treatment (and exercise other rights) if they have sufficient understanding and intelligence to fully understand what is proposed — 'Gillick competence'. Parental rights yield to the child's right to make their own decisions when the child achieves sufficient understanding.

事实

Mrs Gillick sought a declaration that it was unlawful for doctors to prescribe contraception to girls under 16 without parental consent. The DHSS had issued guidance that doctors could do so in exceptional circumstances.

判决摘要

The House of Lords (3-2) held that parental rights exist for the benefit of the child and diminish as the child matures. A child under 16 with sufficient understanding can consent to medical treatment. The test is whether the child has sufficient maturity and intelligence to understand the nature and implications of the proposed treatment.

关键引述

"Parental right yields to the child's right to make his own decisions when he reaches a sufficient understanding and intelligence to be capable of making up his own mind on the matter requiring decision."

Lord Scarman

后续处理

Followed

Universally applied. 'Gillick competence' is a fundamental concept in child law, medical law, and education law.