免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Defamation & Privacy
House of Lords
2001

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd

[2001] 2 AC 127

判决理由

Responsible journalism on matters of public interest could provide a defence to defamation (the Reynolds privilege). A non-exhaustive list of factors ('the Reynolds factors') were relevant to whether the defence was made out.

事实

Albert Reynolds, the former Irish Taoiseach, sued The Sunday Times over an article about his resignation. The newspaper argued it was protected by qualified privilege as responsible journalism on a matter of public interest.

判决摘要

The House of Lords developed a new form of qualified privilege for responsible journalism on matters of public interest. Lord Nicholls set out ten non-exhaustive factors for assessing whether the defence applied, including the seriousness of the allegation, steps taken to verify, and whether comment was sought from the claimant.

关键引述

"The court should have particular regard to the importance of freedom of expression. The press discharges vital functions as a bloodhound as well as a watchdog."

Lord Nicholls

后续处理

Superseded

Replaced by the statutory public interest defence in s.4 Defamation Act 2013, though the Reynolds factors remain relevant to applying s.4.